CTM1 02-06-2016 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
broom_jm (Post 821308)
That's great news, CTM.
More than doubling your acreage, while having it divided by a road for ease of access, creates a lot more opportunities. Depending on how things lay out, could you use large portions of the 85 for sanctuary and hunt the intervening travel routes of deer moving to feed in the food plots you established last year?
Do you have an updated diagram of your expanded property? I really envy those with larger pieces of contiguous ground.
CTM1 02-06-2016 12:51 PM
Having it serve as a sanctuary was my first thought a well, and based on this past hunting season I believe the overwhelming majority of the deer that were coming into my plots were in fact bedding on that side of the road. There are two trails beaten into the earth on that side that run parallel with the mountain. During one of my walks I saw that the neighbor to the right has a ladder stand right on the corner of the property over looking the upper trail. Given there are two old wooden stands that have long since collapsed, it tells me it is a productive trail.
Below is the layout according to the most recent survey. The back of the "66" is really funky, more so then I ever thought so I was curious as to why. Funky property lines is one of my pet peeves, they just leave me scratching my head as to why someone did what they did when subdividing. So after a little research I found out about 130 years ago the land owner in the rear was also a diary farm, and when he divided the property he wanted to keep control of the spot where a spring comes up out of the mountain. If the oppurtunity ever comes up to square up the back line I will jump on it.
On the new parcel I tried to get the owners to agree to move the property line on the left side so it ran straight up the mountian. It would have given me 20 more acres, but more importantly complete control of an old mountain road that runs to the top of the mountain. Despite offering more money and to absord all additional survey expenses, as well as giving them a personal use easement that would not convey if they sold the land they declined. The odd thing is that the way they divided it I have now have control of the lower third of the road so they now have no access to the upper two thirds of the road. They would have to create a new road running parallel to it until they can cut back into it further up the mountain. The crazy thing is they knew this when we made the deal, it left the RE Agent scratching her head as well. Now I have become friendly with the owners son who is an older man so I told him I have no plans to preclude them from coming through me to acces the upper part of the road. The hope is that he reciprocates.
Expanded view of area