Don't worry Okie - I will get this thread back on track:
Holy &$@% what environmental conditions lead to unicorns? Does he fart rainbows, or is that another subspecies?
Sent from my iPhone using Deer Hunter Forum
Holy &$@% what environmental conditions lead to unicorns? Does he fart rainbows, or is that another subspecies?
Sent from my iPhone using Deer Hunter Forum
Holy &$@% what environmental conditions lead to unicorns? Does he fart rainbows, or is that another subspecies?
Sent from my iPhone using Deer Hunter Forum
Easy answer, that deer came from woods that are all but impenetrable for the averaged racked buck, and even then he had to crawl on his knees. Native, got any pics of his calloused knees ?
Uhhh neither of those is what I call narrow. Narrow to me is under 16-17". Neither of those bucks would have made it past 3.5 around here and if they did, it is quite doubtful either would be near that wide, or high or heavy. Our state record, if I remember correctly, is 184". I have seen many mature bucks with 8-12 points that did not measure over 16". I have also many mature bucks with 8-12 points with over 20" of spread. But not in the same area. However, you can travel less than 75-miles from here and find bucks that routinely measure over 20"-spread and one that measured 28.
Wouldn't you agree that what is wide or narrow to man [ you ] is irrelevant in genetic adaptation to habitat. I doubt 1 or 2 inches is meaningful . If bucks are getting shot at 3 or younger who knows what their genetic potential is for width or anything else. They are still babies. The point of the photo was to show completely different genetic variations that are probably 12" different in width both living in the same habitat. That they are mature shows them expressing most if not all their genetic potential .
Baker-I think you are missing the point. What I was pointing out is simply, you cannot compare animals from one area with animals from another, regardless of age. The fact you have two bucks, in your terms, one wide and one narrow, is quite common regardless of the definition of wide and narrow. But compare "wide" only between, say, Alabama or Louisiana and Texas or Oklahoma or IA. Which provides the largest percentage of "wide" spreads in mature bucks? You will find very few 6.5-yr. old bucks killed here that exceed 20" in spread. The norm is more like 17 or 18. That is "Wide, here. In say Alabama, it is even less. That same oddity can be seen various parts of Texas. Compare hill country deer with South Texas deer and plains deer. BUT...in any population, annomalies exist. One such is a deer killed in KY in 1964-it had an inside spread 30-2/8. Yet, it measures a total of two inches smaller that one with an 18-7/8"-inside spread. Two deer from the same general area, but totally opposite in antler configuration-as in the two you showed. Not at all unusual. But in that same area of KY, the average inside spread of the top six or eight bucks taken was about 23-inches. (My records are old-probably been upped some since then due to supplemental feeding and reduction of buck limits.)