dogghr
Well-Known Member
I like Steve's idea on doe harvest even tho it can't be always done. He suggests taking the doe that are not bedding on your property. He wants those homebodies to increase chance that buck will stay home range with her during critical hunting time. I've followed that thot some the last couple years and think I see some advantage.
As for the doe and twins. I know my doe is a good nuturer, cammands the best of birthing and bedding areas in doe hierarchy, thus increasing odds of survival of her newborn. So that doe gets a lot of passes on my part and will take the younger, less experienced doe that may or may not be as good a mother, all other things being equal.
I can't agree completley of Gallows idea of mixing up the gene pool by taking the old doe. If I have a good line of bucks that show good characteristics each year, and I usually do, then I want those current doe genes in my herd if at all possible.
But in reality I am a predator, and I tend to not overthink, just harvest what I need and want at the time. No guilt.
As for the doe and twins. I know my doe is a good nuturer, cammands the best of birthing and bedding areas in doe hierarchy, thus increasing odds of survival of her newborn. So that doe gets a lot of passes on my part and will take the younger, less experienced doe that may or may not be as good a mother, all other things being equal.
I can't agree completley of Gallows idea of mixing up the gene pool by taking the old doe. If I have a good line of bucks that show good characteristics each year, and I usually do, then I want those current doe genes in my herd if at all possible.
But in reality I am a predator, and I tend to not overthink, just harvest what I need and want at the time. No guilt.