Chainsaw
Well-Known Member
All that said, on fragmented properties I wouldn't worry about ratios. Id take whatever does I wanted for food. I'd create attractive habitat to support a population that made me happy.I would be very sensitive to the amount of pressure the deer experienced. And I would do everything I could to encourage everyone around to allow bucks to age. I'd realize that I am not managing a deer herd, I am managing a small piece of habitat that is a part of a much bigger picture and I would do everything within my means to have fun and make it attractive to as many critters as possible.
Your quote above is excellent advice that sure fits this area. The deer numbers in this area are very,very inconsistent from one property to another. This becomes even more evident as the frosts come and kill the annual weeds, as the agricultural corn and beans are harvested and as the hunting pressure applied to some properties drives the deer to less disturbed properties. If each landowner takes a doe or two for food the population stays contained; allowing the bucks to age on our property is easy for us as we have lot's of opportunities. The guys with poor habitat and/or those that put heavy pressure on their property are tough to convince regarding letting bucks grow, not impossible maybe but darned near it. Still we try and see some changes here and there.
And here we must be realistic and should be very excited to have quite a few deer in the 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 range with one or two deer in the area surpassing that. It is as good as we can do with the property sizes, hunter population and extra long firearms season. We constantly strive to make this property the best place for a deer to live in this area and it has been well worth the effort.