homegrownbucks
New Member
So say in Wisconsin on a corn/bean food plot rotation, would you just broadcast into the field in the fall once the crip dries a bit? Then roll/spray in the spring and plant into that?
One things threads like this have taught me is that changing the way a food-plotter thinks is relatively easy, because their livelihood is not in question if it takes them two or three tries to get something working right for them. If I try my hand at grafting and they don't take, there's always another tree or another year, but if I'm trying to make a living from an orchard, failure is very expensive! The same is true with ranchers and farmers...they've got to go into something fully understanding the process and the risks involved. With that said, I am firmly convinced that plows are the devil, growing plants the solution, and throw-n-mow or minimal tillage is, by far, the best choice for most food-plotters or farmers.
It's challenging to read the stuff Doug writes, although I try. Maybe some things don't distill down very well, but when someone fairly new to the game looks through a thread like this, it can make their head spin! A lot of the new folks I work with find the learning curve to be daunting; many give up before really experiencing success. That's too bad, because I think the habitat management stuff is more rewarding than the hunting, at this stage in my life.
Excellent points, BBT...and I fully respect any decision you make that impacts your livelihood and ability to support your family!
With that said, are you able to experiment, on a small scale, with bits and pieces of your farm? I have made offers to farmers to let me lease access to their land, with a stipulation that I control what is planted in a small field, or an odd-shaped off-shoot from a larger field, but I've always been turned down. It seems to me that those are harder to plant and harvest, so maybe there would be opportunities to manage those bits n' pieces differently, just to see what obtains?
I can address this to some extent. Farming is time consuming and most farmers don't want to spend a lot of time changing set-ups. Planting a small odd shaped part of the field differently than the rest may not seem like a big deal but if it requires changing the drill over to the disc, or bringing the tractor back from the back field, or anything that breaks routine becomes unattractive. Not saying that is 100% the issue with experimenting, but I do know a lot of these guys have things planned out to a T and changing things for a little part of the field gets in the way.
I agree 100%.That makes perfect sense, but if you're going to try something new that may help your bottom line, or be cost-neutral while benefiting your soil, those small, odd-shaped pieces of a field would be ideal.
I can address this to some extent. Farming is time consuming and most farmers don't want to spend a lot of time changing set-ups. Planting a small odd shaped part of the field differently than the rest may not seem like a big deal but if it requires changing the drill over to the disc, or bringing the tractor back from the back field, or anything that breaks routine becomes unattractive. Not saying that is 100% the issue with experimenting, but I do know a lot of these guys have things planned out to a T and changing things for a little part of the field gets in the way.
I think so. I've seen some interesting demonstrations on how healthy soil allows better rain infiltration and moisture retention. Wouldn't that help bridge the gap during stress periods?Is it possible, with "Dirt Management" efforts, to have more consistency and less variability in yield? I'm being sincere, not trying to bait anyone.
WOW, alot to read through and digest! Its gonna take me awhile. but to start off with, any ideas where to find one of these soil health consultants?
One things threads like this have taught me is that changing the way a food-plotter thinks is relatively easy, because their livelihood is not in question if it takes them two or three tries to get something working right for them. If I try my hand at grafting and they don't take, there's always another tree or another year, but if I'm trying to make a living from an orchard, failure is very expensive! The same is true with ranchers and farmers...they've got to go into something fully understanding the process and the risks involved. With that said, I am firmly convinced that plows are the devil, growing plants the solution, and throw-n-mow or minimal tillage is, by far, the best choice for most food-plotters or farmers.
It's challenging to read the stuff Doug writes, although I try. Maybe some things don't distill down very well, but when someone fairly new to the game looks through a thread like this, it can make their head spin! A lot of the new folks I work with find the learning curve to be daunting; many give up before really experiencing success. That's too bad, because I think the habitat management stuff is more rewarding than the hunting, at this stage in my life.
Sure. Anything's possible.Is it possible, with "Dirt Management" efforts, to have more consistency and less variability in yield? I'm being sincere, not trying to bait anyone.
Is it possible, with "Dirt Management" efforts, to have more consistency and less variability in yield? I'm being sincere, not trying to bait anyone.
[QUOTE="Turkish, post: 45658, member: 1664]
He went along because he was curious and a failure wasn't the end of the world. I see many farmers NOT being able to take such a risk. Now I also see plenty driving new GMC Denail 2500HDs, too.
Tax purposes on the trucks...
Not sure if I struck a nerve or someone else. I meant no disrespect. I respect farmers. I was only talking about the ones who drive new and insanely expensive vehicles AND complain about their compensation. I doubt that refers to you.Tax purposes on the trucks...
Tax purpose and the fact that we live in our trucks, we dont have anything that new, but they are well taken care of for their age.
I dont understand the mentality that farmers should be second class citizens. If someone does well in a business and has nice things, a big house and lots of expensive cars that rarely get driven, everyone looks up to them, but a farmer buying and using a brand new pickup is looked at with scorn.
Edit: Im sorry but thing like that strike a nerve with me, even our fairly small farm handles more than a million dollars a year, but our average take home is slightly more than a average starting wage of a trade job, or even less some years, while working an average of 80 hours a week or more, then people have the nerve to think we should be second class, not picking on anyone here in particular, just the genereal public.