Mennoniteman
Well-Known Member
I just read this interesting article by John Stossel; Thanksgiving- What the Pilgrims knew about Socialism and Private Property "The Pilgrims had clashing ideas about how to organize their settlement in the New World. Their collective farming -- the whole community deciding when and how much to plant, when to harvest, who would do the work -- was an inefficient disaster, in other words: socialism. “By the spring,” Pilgrim leader William Bradford wrote in his diary, “our food stores were used up and people grew weak and thin. His answer: divide the commune into parcels and assign each Pilgrim family its own property. His resolution made the first Thanksgiving possible. When property rights are tossed aside, even for the sake of religious fellowship or in the name of the working class, people just don’t work as hard. Private property protects us from what economists call the tragedy of the commons. The “commons” is a shared resource. That means it’s really owned by no one, and no one person has much incentive to protect it or develop it" (there's more to this article, good read)
That sentence really caught my eye: and no one person has much incentive to protect it or develop it...
This is the reality of deer habitat management; no one wants to help work, but everyone wants to hunt the food plots, even if they have to sneak in to do it. However, things are about to change here: To keep farmers happy with our newly passed Sunday Hunting three days a year, the State of Pennsylvania has just enacted a much harsher "No Trespassing" law, including a new violation; "Trespassing While Hunting" with the first offense being a class 5 misdemeanor with $250-$500 fine, a second offense is a class 3 misdemeanor with $3000 fine and jail time, hunters need written permission to hunt, fines double on Sundays, land only needs to be reasonably posted, a game cam picture is permissible evidence, and local police and wildlife conservation officers are now authorized to enforce these laws. BTW, our WCO's thrive on aggressively enforcing laws, but in the past they didn't have jurisdiction over trespassing.
So what does this mean for hunters? Pennsylvania may no longer have the weakest private land laws in the nation, and landowners may be able to get away from people who sneak on their land but have "no incentive to protect or develop it".
I believe in being peaceful and helping my fellow man as much as I can, so I sometimes struggle with the thought, am I being greedy by not allowing people to hunt who don't want to contribute?
That sentence really caught my eye: and no one person has much incentive to protect it or develop it...
This is the reality of deer habitat management; no one wants to help work, but everyone wants to hunt the food plots, even if they have to sneak in to do it. However, things are about to change here: To keep farmers happy with our newly passed Sunday Hunting three days a year, the State of Pennsylvania has just enacted a much harsher "No Trespassing" law, including a new violation; "Trespassing While Hunting" with the first offense being a class 5 misdemeanor with $250-$500 fine, a second offense is a class 3 misdemeanor with $3000 fine and jail time, hunters need written permission to hunt, fines double on Sundays, land only needs to be reasonably posted, a game cam picture is permissible evidence, and local police and wildlife conservation officers are now authorized to enforce these laws. BTW, our WCO's thrive on aggressively enforcing laws, but in the past they didn't have jurisdiction over trespassing.
So what does this mean for hunters? Pennsylvania may no longer have the weakest private land laws in the nation, and landowners may be able to get away from people who sneak on their land but have "no incentive to protect or develop it".
I believe in being peaceful and helping my fellow man as much as I can, so I sometimes struggle with the thought, am I being greedy by not allowing people to hunt who don't want to contribute?
Last edited: