Lots of coyotes too?It is a grey fox stronghold here.
G
Greys are known for their superior tree climbing ability. That should help them some with coyotes.I thought reds were the ones decimated by coyotes but I may have that backwards.
I’ve seen a few reds in person at our place and get occasional night pictures but can’t tell if they’re reds or grays.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Greys are known for their superior tree climbing ability. That should help them some with coyotes.
I thought it was a matter of coyotes outcompeting them for the niche they fill. Similar food sources and such. Not that coyotes won't kill a fox...
Absolutely, and coyotes would have no trouble killing foxes for two reasons:I’m no predator ecologist but from what I understand, coyotes and foxes are too similar in the role they play on the landscape. That’s why they actively seek out and kill foxes.
Interesting and adjacent, wolves in Yellowstone practically removed every coyote from the landscape due to seeing them as competition. The wolves don’t aggressively seek out foxes, in theory because there is no real overlap of the prey they hunt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lots of coyotes too?
Time to thin those yotes down a bit?Yes, plenty. Better cover may be better cover for fox too.
It is temporary at best unless done very intensely over a very wide area. You can probably have some impact on deer recruitment based on timing in a smaller area. Hitting them hard in the winter before spring fawning probably improves fawn survival. Enduring that fawning cover is in large blocks rather than narrow strips makes it harder for coyotes to hunt fawns. I chatted with a USDA wildlife biologist one day who had been working on a study that seemed to indicate removing certain males and certain times from the population can make females produce more pups with a higher percentage female. I'm not sure how that study ended as it was in process when we chatted, but it certainly complicates coyote management.Time to thin those yotes down a bit?
Time to thin those yotes down a bit?
It is temporary at best unless done very intensely over a very wide area. You can probably have some impact on deer recruitment based on timing in a smaller area. Hitting them hard in the winter before spring fawning probably improves fawn survival. Enduring that fawning cover is in large blocks rather than narrow strips makes it harder for coyotes to hunt fawns. I chatted with a USDA wildlife biologist one day who had been working on a study that seemed to indicate removing certain males and certain times from the population can make females produce more pups with a higher percentage female. I'm not sure how that study ended as it was in process when we chatted, but it certainly complicates coyote management.
More trees to climb would definitely be better for the Grey Foxes.Yes, plenty. Better cover may be better cover for fox too.
Yes, our recruitment is down since the coyotes moved in.I couldn't thin enough to possibly not do harm. What's more, by killing the wrong or dominants you can get more roguish behavior out of what were subordinates. In my first 4 years here 5 or 6 does frequenting my property were lucky to get 1 fawn live till fall. Last year I had 4 or 5 fawns make it till fawn. Chainsaw, imazapyr, and fire have made this possible. Last summer as I waded through blackberries to kill tree of hell, I found tiny little deer beds in the middle of the thickest briar patches.
G
A USDA wildlife biologist is not necessarily a neutral source to quote, with the hidden agendas of more recent graduates tainting the reputation of all (more on the agenda later).It is temporary at best unless done very intensely over a very wide area. You can probably have some impact on deer recruitment based on timing in a smaller area. Hitting them hard in the winter before spring fawning probably improves fawn survival. Enduring that fawning cover is in large blocks rather than narrow strips makes it harder for coyotes to hunt fawns. I chatted with a USDA wildlife biologist one day who had been working on a study that seemed to indicate removing certain males and certain times from the population can make females produce more pups with a higher percentage female. I'm not sure how that study ended as it was in process when we chatted, but it certainly complicates coyote management.
No hidden agenda here. She was working on her PHD and involved personally in the study. Coyotes were not an issue at my place at that time. It was just a side discussion. She wasn't pushing any point of view. She spoke as a scientist hedging her bets saying this is just one emerging study. She took no hard position on anything. She was there to help us establish an EQIP cost share program for firebreaks and controlled burns.A USDA wildlife biologist is not necessarily a neutral source to quote, with the hidden agendas of more recent graduates tainting the reputation of all (more on the agenda later).
Coyotes are not mythical creatures that can appear at will, they are flesh and blood that either exist or they don't. Just like deer herd reduction, if eliminated they cease to exist and there aren't any more. The idea of an unlimited resupply like a Greek Hydra is beyond factual. When we're talking about reducing, serious wildlife managers are thinking on a different scale than the people that talk about others moving in to take their place.
My friend thought he had a problem of around six or eight coyotes, he took out 21 over 3 months time on 400 acres with a thermal, however, after that his fun was over, there were no more. No more at all for several years.
Yes, taking a few over a few weeks time is nibbling around the edges and could make the coyote problem worse (or better). But that's not what we're talking about, when people in my circles are talking about it being time to reduce coyote numbers. Solutions where there just aren't any more left are very possible, and last a long time. Unfortunately, today's wildlife biologists don't want to hear this because they are being taught in school that predators aren't the problem, they are the solution. And many liberals are buying into this.
But the pioneers that settled this country sure didn't share these beliefs. They shot the predators and ate the game to survive. Now predators eat the game animals, and hunting probably won't survive. Which is the hidden agenda.