dogghr
Well-Known Member
Yep its a variety of factors for sure and despite so many ways to determine deer population, it comes down to just getting a feel for your land. I know by what I see after these years, as to whether and how many doe we will shoot that season. But everything from available food to road kill to neighbors hunting to predator population enters in to the decision.AHH so true Dogghr! However, I do see one issue with this browse pressure method, and this is just a theory of mine so I could be wrong.
When I look at my farm and the surrounding area it had what most of us would say a "healthy" number of deer. Now like many areas of Ohio and other parts of the Midwest, when timber is ripe for the cutting much an area is all done at one time. In our case we had 100s, if not thousands of surrounding acres cut all within a 2-4 year window. Now during that window, deer harvest numbers did not increase, actually I would say they decreased due to the deer having better habitat to hide in when the guns started to crack.
In this scenario if you measure browse pressure in late winter, you might not notice a significant amount of heavy browse in year one, year two or year three even.After year 4, when the browse is now over a deer's head, the area that just a year before seemed to not be over browsed can be decimated due to increase in deer from better bedding habitat but also decrease in browse within a deer's reach.
So my question is, do you think one can under-estimate the number of deer you have by only doing a late winter survey or making the assumption (as many hunters do as of recent) that your native browse can handle significantly more browse, only to have the perfect storm situation hit when browse levels decrease, deer numbers increase and now your fighting an uphill battle?
I am not sure if any of that makes sense as I type this or if I am just rambling, I hope this comes off as some what of a coherent thought.
In 2015-2016 winters we had mast failure, I had several road kill deer, and adjacent owner let a yahoo shoot everything in sight. We honestly have not shot a deer except for a buck each season since then and no does. Last years mild winter, heavy mast has allowed deer to recover and once again see more bucks than doe on my place as it used to be. Predator numbers are constant so I know what to do. Kinda.
Logging typically produces best deer food year 3-7 then drops off . I manage for a mixed forest with emphasis on mature mast producers so I'm not at the mercy of logging recovery. But that's another discussion that goes agains the logging and forestry propaganda that deer and mature forest do no work together. One only has to read the old journals of the explorers into the mature forests to disprove that theory. Many factors, for sure, but its doable. But I digress.
I think deer numbers seen with in the woods give a better feel for population than the numbers seen in a field. But I'm just a barefoot inbred uneducated hillbilly, what do I know? Seriously good luck, I think you have a gold mine.