Best time to evaluate browse is late winter, early spring. If brush is eaten past an inch or to the second bud then you have too many deer or not enough natural browse. Of course drought or poor hard mast years in the east can affect this. Good luck on your season with those brutes.
AHH so true Dogghr! However, I do see one issue with this browse pressure method, and this is just a theory of mine so I could be wrong.
When I look at my farm and the surrounding area it had what most of us would say a "healthy" number of deer. Now like many areas of Ohio and other parts of the Midwest, when timber is ripe for the cutting much an area is all done at one time. In our case we had 100s, if not thousands of surrounding acres cut all within a 2-4 year window. Now during that window, deer harvest numbers did not increase, actually I would say they decreased due to the deer having better habitat to hide in when the guns started to crack.
In this scenario if you measure browse pressure in late winter, you might not notice a significant amount of heavy browse in year one, year two or year three even.After year 4, when the browse is now over a deer's head, the area that just a year before seemed to not be over browsed can be decimated due to increase in deer from better bedding habitat but also decrease in browse within a deer's reach.
So my question is, do you think one can under-estimate the number of deer you have by only doing a late winter survey or making the assumption (as many hunters do as of recent) that your native browse can handle significantly more browse, only to have the perfect storm situation hit when browse levels decrease, deer numbers increase and now your fighting an uphill battle?
I am not sure if any of that makes sense as I type this or if I am just rambling, I hope this comes off as some what of a coherent thought.