tlh2865
Active Member
I thought I might post this in case others might like to try. I have been successfully scoring bucks in my trail camera pictures with pretty high accuracy for the past two years. I have been able to confirm the method's validity on two very differently framed deer taken over the course of two seasons. On both occasions my error on the final score was less than 6 inches.
I use a pair of digital reloading calipers to measure the antlers of the book in question, length of tines, diameter of bases & at mass measurement points, spread, and length of main beams. All of these numbers can then be used in a proportion, comparing them to a measurement taken of something of known length in the picture. I use the ear, which in my area is almost always 5 inches from tip to canal.
The only detail that is required for this to work is that the deer must be facing the camera in order to obtain the most accurate measurements.
I use a pair of digital reloading calipers to measure the antlers of the book in question, length of tines, diameter of bases & at mass measurement points, spread, and length of main beams. All of these numbers can then be used in a proportion, comparing them to a measurement taken of something of known length in the picture. I use the ear, which in my area is almost always 5 inches from tip to canal.
The only detail that is required for this to work is that the deer must be facing the camera in order to obtain the most accurate measurements.