Nebraskaz71
Active Member
sub1 is a lil slow for me but otherwise its one of the best bows ive ever held, feels so nicely put together, good balance, plus u can de-cock it!
Excalibur has had a decocking system for a while now. Excalibur is the best crossbow IMO, except for the width,I've had several windows broken by guys shooting my Excalibur's out of my hexagon blinds. Thanks for the input, I'll take a look at the new ten point.sub1 is a lil slow for me but otherwise its one of the best bows ive ever held, feels so nicely put together, good balance, plus u can de-cock it!
Why the nitro over the stealth?Ill be ordering the new tenpoint nitro x this spring I believe, pricey but hopefully worth it
According to Ten Point's website the reverse draw Nitro is 2.9" shorter, 30 fps faster, 1" wider, 8 oz. heavier, and $550 more than the Stealth. The narrower conventional draw stealth would work better for shooting out of a blind, and with the cams being further back they just might balance about the same? I'd also like to handle them, maybe at the upcoming Great American Outdoor Show in Harrisburg. Both of these are advertised as new models, which is a concern, I always like to buy the second version of a model, where the bugs have been worked out of it.Well i wont decide till i can hold either one this spring but generally the reverse draw bows like the nitro put the weight farther back torwards your shoulder making them balance much better, plus its faster and 6" shorter but we shall see.
Do you own a Ravin? Or is this stuff that you read on the internet, probably on Crossbow Talk or Crossbow Nation where a few guys have it in for Ravin and bad mouth them when ever they can. As far as the new nocks not solving the problem, have you heard of any problems after the new nocks came out. Most of the problems came from people not using correct nocks by their own admission to start with even though Ravin stated in instructions to only use their nocks and arrows. As far as patent Ravin has a license from Ten Point to use their narrow crossbow license which any crossbow manufacturer has to get a license if their crossbow is under a certain amount of inches just as Ten Point uses a license from another manufacturer for their reverse draw crossbows. Licensing agreements are something that many manufacturers use. As far as people not getting the nock replacements if they called or emailed and had their crossbows registered Ravin sent the nocks out. Ten point would never have made their new crossbows as narrow as they did if Ravin hadn't came out with last years model. It was only a few years ago Ten Point had problem with their trigger/safety which they denied saying it was user error at first and then had to do a recall on their triggers on certain models or did you forget to mention that. As far as rail vs railess, 3 of my brothers have Ten Point Venoms, not one of them match the accuracy of my Ravin. As far as the guy asking my suggestion is try shooting them both and buy what feels best for you.See now to add my opinion to what tom said, tenpoint isnt playing catch up, ravin actually used tepoints patent to design their bows, the question is wether they did it legally or not. A railess design like a ravin will never be as accurate consistently as a railed bow like the tenpoint. Tenpoints new accudraw pro is far far superior and doesnt need a ribbon like the ravin. Their customer service is horrible from what i've seen, even after all the injuries from ravin they insisted it was a nock problem not the trigger and refused to correct it properly plus people are still waiting for the nocks to "fix" the problem. As far as speed goes, tenpoint does use a 370 grain for their highest speed rating but that would only be 10fps off from a 400 grain plus tenpoint lists all kinds of speeds for various weights on their site unlike ravin. Also for what its worth ravin requires you to use their arrows, if u use any other brand arrow they void the warranty and have also threatened lawsuits against customers for such things. Just throwin some more info out there.
This is an example of..."If I have to explain it to you, then you won't understand".
It's BOW season, or at least it used to be. Now it's "any season" that we can convince the legislators to legalize.
I have nothing against kids. I drive a school bus and there are 14 year old girls on my bus that can easily draw and accurately shoot 80% let-off compounds that will kill anything on the continent. But they don't hunt with their compounds... they shoot their compounds for competition and do just fine (they drill bullseyes at hunting distances), but then they feel the need to hunt with a crossbow? 'Splain that to me without using the phrase "It's legal". But "The legislators have declared it legal, so It's legal"... so that's the mindset. Anything legal, right?
I prefer the mindset of being a bow hunter means using a bow during bow season.
But, if I gotta explain it...
The bow vs crossbow thing isn't important to me either way because choice of weapon is too far down the list of my hunting priorities if I had a list. So I'll make a list and see what it looks like;
#1 The thrill of the chase.
#2 Camaraderie with hunting buddies.
#3 Time of year when it's nice to be outdoors.
#4 Observing plenty of wildlife (thanks to nice plots)
#5 Making a clean one shot kill.
#6 Filling out a tag.
#7 Type of weapon used.
Probably any of these could move up or down one. And of course, being safe and legal is more important than all of these together. Isn't it interesting that the hunting laws made by our government influence our choice of weapons more than anything else? In Saskatchewan on the reservations they don't have special seasons for archery and nobody knows anything about bow hunting for deer there. If we didn't have early archery only seasons bow hunting would probably die out in one generation.