Actually, it's about allowing necked case ammunition. That is "supposed" to be what "or other" means but there is no real clarification on it. The whole push on this bill is to allow necked ammunition to be used in rifles. Subsection 5 specifically removes the verbiage stating straight walled only ammunition. It replaces it with the following: any pistol or revolver with a barrel of at least four inches and firing a straight walled or other centerfire ammunition propelling an expanding bullet (etc., etc., etc,.........). In subsection 6-b it specifically removes "straight walled" altogether and replaces it with "cartridge rifle". I can see the Iowa courts filling up with hunters being ticketed for violations due to this vague verbiage of this new law. Many will get off, the state will be hit with court costs, and lawyers are going to make a fortune. We went through this same thing here in AL over hunting deer over bait. The laws in the beginning were vague and left to interpretation of the individual game wardens and hunters to fight over. We always had our local warden come survey our feeders before they finally simplified the law to what it is now. The first year we hunted with feeders, they had to be a minimum of 100 yards from a stand and out of line of sight by either terrain or vegetation. The game warden came in and checked all of our feeders and said we were in compliance. The next year we had a new game warden. He came and surveyed the same feeders in the same locations. He said over two thirds of them were out of compliance and needed to be moved or removed. Same feeders, same locations, same law, different game warden. Now the law has been simplified. You can hunt over bait with no distance limit or line of sight. You are just required to have a special $15 permit for each feeder or bait location. Simple, no margin of error and the state makes money.