MidwestMatthew
New Member
I'm not talking about missing completely, but am trying to account for margin of error.
Some relevant info: I use sabot slugs in a 1960's-era rifled 12ga. Its aperture sight limits my shots to about 60 yards (further than that and the front bead pretty much covers the vital area). Consistency is pretty good, with 3-shot groups often touching at 50 yards.
The problem is that I have a difficult time judging distance and therefore judging elevation. I may be off vertically by 3 or 4 inches (rarely, but sometimes, as much as 5).
So all things considered, is it better to aim a trifle high, and risk "missing" high if the slug doesn't drop as much as I expect? Or is it better to aim dead-on and risk "missing" low if the drop is more considerable?
If you had to choose to miss your aiming point by, say, up to 4 inches up or down, where would you rather hit?
I know experience will help with this, but I'm a newish hunter (last year was my first time) and would appreciate any tips in the meantime!
Some relevant info: I use sabot slugs in a 1960's-era rifled 12ga. Its aperture sight limits my shots to about 60 yards (further than that and the front bead pretty much covers the vital area). Consistency is pretty good, with 3-shot groups often touching at 50 yards.
The problem is that I have a difficult time judging distance and therefore judging elevation. I may be off vertically by 3 or 4 inches (rarely, but sometimes, as much as 5).
So all things considered, is it better to aim a trifle high, and risk "missing" high if the slug doesn't drop as much as I expect? Or is it better to aim dead-on and risk "missing" low if the drop is more considerable?
If you had to choose to miss your aiming point by, say, up to 4 inches up or down, where would you rather hit?
I know experience will help with this, but I'm a newish hunter (last year was my first time) and would appreciate any tips in the meantime!