Those are the ones that work best for us. Oddly, we accidently installed some upside down with the holes at the bottom, and performed much better than the holes at the top. We now use those almost exclusively for the Chinquapins and install "upside down". Once they start poking out of the top of the tubes, we cage as well.
We tried the green ones and green ones with slits that didn't work well with the Chinquapins, but worked with oaks. We are going to start taking the green ones, and cut them down for rodent girdling when we pull tubes off our 4-5 year old trees in April.
I'm still trying to figure out the best stakes. Fiberglass were great but expensive and tough to find. Regular wood stacks rot too quickly. Plastic deteriorate in the sun too quick. Bamboo has been tough to get quality pieces - half are good / half are bad when ordered. I'm worried about t-posts cutting roots when removing.
For most of my chestnuts and other trees, over the years, I've used PVC. I don't like solid stakes, I want mine to bend in the wind so trees don't get brittle. The longer you leave them tubed or staked the more this matters. For my high value trees, I used cages made of cement wire. I like that because it stands on it's own. you can just stake the bottom foot with rebar to keep them from moving. I would then string rope across the cage with 2 strands in each direction near the top. It captures the seedling. This lets the seedling blow significantly in the wind but it is limited by the rope so it does not get too much. I like this method best for valuable trees.
For the trees I tube, I don't like holes near the bottom. This may depend on your location and climate. I found that holes near the bottom can create a chimney effect as the tube heats up and the hot air rises. This can cause small seedlings to dry out. On the other hand, if you have no air flow, you can create humid conditions where mold thrives in the tube.
It is all about figuring out what works best in your specific situation. I would not use tube at all if I was in an area where I did not need to worry about deer browsing. One year I had more chestnuts than I had tubes and planted some with not protection. Years later, those that survived are bushes with no central leader. I doubt they will ever produce nuts, or at least not for many years.
I don't have that concern with ACs. They will bear nuts in just a few years regardless if they take tree or bush form.
For the ACs that I just planted at my retirement property, I just used what was easy. I had a bunch of step-in electric fence posts sitting around from a Gallagher-style e-fence I used years ago. Since I was direct seeding nuts in tubes and there was no digging involved, they were very convenient. At my farm, I often planted ACs with no protection. Although we had high deer densities. we had lots of native ACs, so deer were used to them. They got browsed a bit but generally not killed. Since AC produce nuts in bush form, it was just easier and cheaper to plant them with no protection. At my retirement property, I've got security video cameras on the barn near where I planted these ACs. We had a mast crop failure this year, and I'm seeing up to 15 deer at once around the barn at night eating the WR/Clover/PTT I planted. I know they would paw up these nuts if I did nothing here. I'm hoping after a year or two to remove the tubes.