Jason Broom
Well-Known Member
I posted another link to an article about glyphosate some time back, wherein a US agency charged with studying gly for carcinogenic effects was unable to find any link between gly and cancer. At that time, the World Health Organization (and its IARC unit) had published a report that glyphosate was "probably carcinogenic".
Well, this new article from Reuters suggests that the ORIGINAL finding was that gly does NOT cause cancer, or at least that they were unable to find any causal link of such, and that their "report" was modified in such a way as to obscure that little fact! When a news agency such as Reuters, which is about as objective as they come, in this day and age, is willing to publish an article like this, it really makes you think.
http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/who-iarc-glyphosate/
Well, this new article from Reuters suggests that the ORIGINAL finding was that gly does NOT cause cancer, or at least that they were unable to find any causal link of such, and that their "report" was modified in such a way as to obscure that little fact! When a news agency such as Reuters, which is about as objective as they come, in this day and age, is willing to publish an article like this, it really makes you think.
http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/who-iarc-glyphosate/