photo bucket wants $$$$$$$

[Doe Shooter]

I've been using photo bucket for my 3rd Party Hosting for posting my pics in connection with postings on a number of boards.


Photobucket defines 3rd party hosting as the action of embedding an image or photo onto another website. For example, using the <img> tag to embed or display a JPEG image from your Photobucket account on another website such as a forum, Etsy, eBay auction listings, a blog, etc. is definitively 3rd party hosting.

Now I get a notice that they want money for this service. I never would have signed up if I knew that it was going to go this way.

What are other people using?

 

[catscratch]

I use Tapatalk and post everything from my phone (that's what I take pics with anyway... makes it really easy!).
In the meantime, I'm filling up as much photobucket space as I can with worthless pics.

 

[Doe Shooter]

I'm kinda old school .I use tracfone for $8.00 a month. It's a smart phone but is really primitive compared to the I phone or others. Anyway tap talk won't fit my usage pattern, but good to know.Thanks

 

[j-bird]

I simply pull my pics off of my phone and use a clipping/snipping tool/program to take them to a paint program and save them as a jpeg I also then take those pics and save them to a thumb drive for later use if needed. It's not as handy I am sure, but it works. I do most of my "surfing" with my laptop so it isn't that big of a deal for me.

 

[lakngolf]

I started using imgur about year ago. It works pretty good. Photobucket always hung up and took forever. Now with the charge thing it is worse. I was there recently to retrieve an old picture to post some before and after shots. I was shocked when they hit me with the charge thing. SO, I brought up the picture, used Snipping Tool to take a snapshot of it, saved to disc. That method left the jpeg small enough that it will load auto into forum posting. IMGUR for all other pictures that have size

 

[JohnL48]

I belong to a jeep restoration site. Documented my entire restoration with pictures now lost the whole thing due to photobuckets new rule. They want 400.00 a yr.......it will happen here too

 

[X-farmerdan]

There's always a chance I'm going to write something here and appear to be - well, you pick the descriptions! LOL!

I don't get the whole string of stuff going on here. I don't use Photobucket. That makes me naive. For better or worse.

I looked at Photobucket and, yes, they will charge you nearly $400 for 500 Gigabytes of storage. How much storage do you need? As a rule of thumb 500GB stores approximately 100,000 digital photos taken with a 6-megapixel camera.
You might burn that much space if you are uploading full resolution photos, the kind you might take if you wanted an image on a billboard (he said in jest just to make a point).

Again, I'd didn't go too deep but I'd guess a site like Photobucket has an option to reduce photos to some acceptable resolution. If viewing on a computer screen is all you want a 300 kb resolution pic is plenty. For $400 a year, you can store 1-million-six-hundred-and-sixty-six-thousand 300 kb pictures (if I got my math right).

Photobucket offers 2 GB for free (with ads). Again, if I do my math correctly free gets you 6-thousand+ 300kb pictures. Anyhow, after all that I will tell you I use Google....for free. Unlimited storage for reduced resolution photos. If you want to keep full resolution you'll be back in the pay-for-storage market.

Maybe I misunderstand the whole thing!

 

[JohnL48]

There's always a chance I'm going to write something here and appear to be - well, you pick the descriptions! LOL!

I don't get the whole string of stuff going on here. I don't use Photobucket. That makes me naive. For better or worse.

I looked at Photobucket and, yes, they will charge you nearly $400 for 500 Gigabytes of storage. How much storage do you need? As a rule of thumb 500GB stores approximately 100,000 digital photos taken with a 6-megapixel camera.
You might burn that much space if you are uploading full resolution photos, the kind you might take if you wanted an image on a billboard (he said in jest just to make a point).

Again, I'd didn't go too deep but I'd guess a site like Photobucket has an option to reduce photos to some acceptable resolution. If viewing on a computer screen is all you want a 300 kb resolution pic is plenty. For $400 a year, you can store 1-million-six-hundred-and-sixty-six-thousand 300 kb pictures (if I got my math right).

Photobucket offers 2 GB for free (with ads). Again, if I do my math correctly free gets you 6-thousand+ 300kb pictures. Anyhow, after all that I will tell you I use Google....for free. Unlimited storage for reduced resolution photos. If you want to keep full resolution you'll be back in the pay-for-storage market.

Maybe I misunderstand the whole thing!

I believe their new rule is you have to pay the 400.00 a yr to enable 3rd party hosting (posting pictures to a forum )

 

[catscratch]

I believe their new rule is you have to pay the 400.00 a yr to enable 3rd party hosting (posting pictures to a forum )

Yep. You can still store photos for free but can't post them without paying $$$.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[cutman]

There's always a chance I'm going to write something here and appear to be - well, you pick the descriptions! LOL!

I don't get the whole string of stuff going on here. I don't use Photobucket. That makes me naive. For better or worse.

I looked at Photobucket and, yes, they will charge you nearly $400 for 500 Gigabytes of storage. How much storage do you need? As a rule of thumb 500GB stores approximately 100,000 digital photos taken with a 6-megapixel camera.
You might burn that much space if you are uploading full resolution photos, the kind you might take if you wanted an image on a billboard (he said in jest just to make a point).

Again, I'd didn't go too deep but I'd guess a site like Photobucket has an option to reduce photos to some acceptable resolution. If viewing on a computer screen is all you want a 300 kb resolution pic is plenty. For $400 a year, you can store 1-million-six-hundred-and-sixty-six-thousand 300 kb pictures (if I got my math right).

Photobucket offers 2 GB for free (with ads). Again, if I do my math correctly free gets you 6-thousand+ 300kb pictures. Anyhow, after all that I will tell you I use Google....for free. Unlimited storage for reduced resolution photos. If you want to keep full resolution you'll be back in the pay-for-storage market.

Maybe I misunderstand the whole thing!

Yes, you misunderstand it. As others have said, they have disabled the ability to post photos directly onto other sites. You can't embed Photobucket hosted photos without paying the $400.

 

[John Paul]

I left Photobucket years ago for Smugmug. I pay $200 a year because I run a business partly using Smugmug.