The New Coyote and Other Predators..... Can You Win?

dogghr

Well-Known Member
I know I stand with a limited group on these forums that don't sweat the predator, and even learn from them at times. Predators come in lots of forms from the yote to the bear to the hawk, and others. I attacked this discussion on the old forum and I don't expect a strong following but I do know there are lessons and knowledge to be learned. I don't expect to make you want to go hug a predator and thank them, but I hope to show how they affect our habitat and its management. And I hope to show that IF you choose, or cannot aggressively shoot or trap predators, that you should not be frustrated as you do have options. And for those that have not taken the time to fully appreciate what the predator can accomplish, I hope to tweak an interest. Comments are welcome of all opinions, you won't hurt my feelings but don't get mad if I laugh a little. Leopold embraced his failure to recognize function of the predator long before our deer herds had exploded to the numbers we have today and often talked of their purpose in the ecology of the landscape. Come along with me and lets look at the predator, especially the much despised Eastern coyote. This will be a long post.

I am no expert but I think I have read and studied enough studies since the 80's and have first hand experience that I can at least share some info. The state I live has had the predator of eagle, Fischer, bear in good numbers most my life. Beginning in the early 80's, farmers were complaining of coyotes being a problem. As with many, I despised them as a group, but as time, and my knowledge moved forward, my attitude changed. I still shoot and trap them and feel that is more a hobby for me than expecting it will truly make a difference.
The first coyote I ever saw was early 80's on a late winter bow hunt. I heard a deer coming thru the woods and she passed me running harder than any deer I'd ever seen. Close behind her came this dog/fox thing that as it neared, I realized was a yote. As I went to draw , it reversed 180 deg faster than any animal I'd ever seen, and ran off. I was intrigued from then on.
Move on and one evening I left a gut shot doe lay, intending to get her the next morning. As you might expect, she was picked clean and I would never leave a deer in the wood again. I still wonder if she were dead when they found her, I hope so. And it peaked my concern as what if I were injured, would these wolf like animal possibly attack if I were defenseless. So I from then on packed a pistol, not for fear of bear, but of fear of the yotes.
Fast forward thru the years. I sat on a bow stand over looking a bedding area 70 yds away. A grey bearded alpha coyote who I knew well, passed my stand and walked into the midst of the bedding area. Within a minute of his passing thru there, no less than a dozen deer, up and down wind, within yards of his path, stood and began leisurely feeding.
I've got pics of deer standing within yards of bear and coyote as they passed. The deer watched, but were aware but not alarmed, and continued feeding after the passes. Hardly the drama we would imagine.
I'll try to stay with studies more recent past 10 years for this post even tho there are those going back into the early 70's I've read.

Now make no mistake, deer , especially fawn, are taken by these predators, and we have to acknowledge that and plan accordingly. More on that much later.

Eastern Coyote. It is important to understand that these are much different than those that live in the midwest plains. DNA has proven that they interbred with wolf on their path thru the north and into most of the NE. They are 30% larger, or about 10#. And they hunt much like wolves , in groups, and capable of taking down large game, including adult deer. They followed the growing deer herd from the north, staying east of the OH river. This group merged in with another group that migrated up from the south so areas of WV, VA, and PA have these two intermixing. Eventually, being opportunistic , they have migrated across the OH into the midwest areas, as have the bear.
Genetics. The West, the coyote is 100% gene pool yote. The wolf will readily kill them, and where wolf, seldom many yotes. The Great Lake area...85% wolf/15% yote genes. Ontario...58% wolf/42% yote genes.
As a side note, the Red Wolf which has been reintroduced into the Carolinas to supposedly reestablish the natural breed, is only 23 % wolf. Thus the coyote of the south is more wolf than the wolf they are trying to reintroduce!! Typical.

Well lets trap and shoot them then. Hold on. One study of 8000 ac, they trapped 475 yotes the first year. Indeed the first year, fawn recruitment increase. But then recruitment leveled back to pre trapping numbers. They ran 50 traps/night for 4 months for 3 years without any significant impact. When you kill, the remaining ones then shift home ranges which exposes more fawns as the roam more. 30000 yotes have been killed in SC yet no real change in fawn recruitment has occurred. The SE is dealing with more a yote issue than much the rest of the country for a variety of reasons. Northern deer have seemed to have adapted better to their presence.
Another study incorporated a 55 sq mile and a 22 sq mile area with removal of the predator. Again, the first year, there was an improvement in fawn recruitment, and again, it returned to near prepredator levels the following years. Yet another southern study removed coyotes and fence predator proof fence was placed. Again, levels moved up first year the returned to nearly the same recruitment levels of the unfenced area.
In most any study, it is expected the fawn survival rate is about 50% with most losses within the first 3 months of birth and as expected, main losses occur in June. Another fawn study showed About 55% die the first wk and about 23 % starve/abandoned. 40-60% of the deaths are predator related.
In one study from 2006-2012, of 138 adult female deer fitted with collars, 87 % survived the period with losses mainly from hunting and vehicles.

There are 2 types of coyote groups. Transient and Resident. The transient group move in circular pattern up to 150 miles, often following interstates, even crossing bridges, usually between 2-5 AM. They move every 2-6 wks for as much a 30 miles/ day. If they enter an area where there is enough food, then they know the resident yote is dead, and they move in and become that resident.
It has been shown in some older studies that if the alpha male is killed, the subordinates then become more aggressive trying to establish themselves as the alpha and more fawn predation occurs in the short term. In addition, some studies promote the idea if yotes are killed, they tend to produce larger litters to compensate. Thus an established pack, with a resident alpha male, tend to cause less drama with the deer herd. I can attest to that as my grey beard, the one I mentioned early in this text, has been with me nearly 7 years that I know of and even tho I know his routine quite well, and on camera often, I seldom see much issue with his group. But I am quite aware that they and my bear take some of my fawns at least. But there may be other reasons because of my choice of management.

Two main types of predation. Compensatory and Additive. Compensatory is where a predator kills that which would have died from other causes later in the year, i.e. starved to death, while additive predation are ills that add to the total mortality rate, i.e. such as healthy deer that would have survived. So the question to be asked in and area is whether most predation is additive or compensatory.

So what are we to do? I've trapped up to 12 yotes/yr on another property. The next year, seems not much difference in there numbers, and another 7-12 will be taken. An adjacent county in VA has had a bounty for 30 years. Despite heavy trapping and shooting, they still have an apparent problem. I just don't think most managers have the time, energy, or money to actually make a difference on relatively small properties. Studies show that to be effective, it must encompass thousands of acreage.

First , evaluate your habitat. Is it over browsed? Do you have great safe bedding and fawning areas? Is there plenty of edge present for escape? Are you setting up prime attack areas by using corn piles, feeders, or mineral licks? Are your plots simply concentrated feeding areas that a predator can easily access? Have you taken into account the obvious number of deer that predators will take and adjusted your self imposed limits accordingly? Is your herd healthy, having a concentrated fawn drop, thus overwhelming predator affect?

Or do you whine and moan about predators taking your beloved deer, grabbing a gun to shoot the occasional running yote only to stay aggravated. Or do you observe and see their amazing adaptability? Do you notice less mice, less groundhogs, less skunks, less coons, less snakes, that can be a nuisance? Do you watch how they move, where they travel, how they hunt and learn from their techniques? Do you spend time improving that habitat such as to make the predator job difficult?
We certainly are guardians of our landscape. I doubt many of us could feed our family every day, every wk of every year from what we catch. Learn and respect. Look at your habitat from the inside-out,as part of the equation, not from the outside-in as most of society does. Read Leopold and understand of what he means when he speaks of what the mountain knows.

Part 2
http://deerhunterforum.com/index.ph...an-you-win-part-2-black-bear-and-others.3766/
 
Last edited:
^^^ You and I are very much on the same page with this topic! I seldom shoot a yote while on stand, choosing instead to watch and enjoy the show. I've gotten to know certain yotes during a season and look forward to seeing them on any given morning. They catch a mouse or two and pretty much rub shoulders with deer without fear from them (sometimes a young buck or doe will chase a yote off for a few yards, but I've never seen it the other way around).

I think I've read much of the same studies as you talked about. One thing I didn't see as I scanned through your post was the fact that coyotes increase litter size when the population drops. So, since the yote rut happens in Feb/March and the pups are born in conjunction of fawning dates of mid summer... if you shoot yotes in the middle of winter it stands to reason that you are encouraging larger littler of pups. Hence the lack of declining population numbers, even when associated with intense trapping.

Thanks for the thread. Enjoyable thread for me.
 
Last edited:
I certainly appreciate and have no dispute to your post Dogghr. I admire yotes for what they are. I will waste an arrow on them, but rarely a bullet. Thats for trophy reasons only. But i will confess that my motto is kill them all, because more will show up.
I have hunted them for sport and fur and been as excited on those hunts as most any other. Hats off to wily coyote. Doesnt mean i wont wish to drop the last one of them, selfishly i suppose.
 
Where I live, there are 1.7 fetuses per adult doe and slightly less than .5 fawns per doe. Our G&F refuses to study coyotes - yet they do a study on how many fawns feral hogs are eating - could not prove any. In our state, our G&F also protects coyotes during May and June - during fawning season - but you may kill them the rest of the year. You may legally kill a coyote during May and June if it is depredating your garden eating a fifty cent tomato - but you may not legally kill a coyote in June while it is killing a fawn in which you spend thousands of dollars trying to produce. At my place, frequency of coyote pictures in my best fawning cover increases three hundred percent during May and June - they know it is fawning season and adjust their hunting patterns accordingly. I trap coyotes around one of my three gardens during May and June to keep them from eating tomatoes. At least at my place - you dont have to catch them all - you just have to pressure them. Catch one or two and display the carcasses and the frequency of pictures goes way down. I have done annual camera surveys for years, and since I have started trapping around my gardens - catching a couple coyotes per year - my fawn recruitment numbers have gone from .5 to .6. That is a 20% increase - that is a LOT in my estimation. Especially when you project the increase in deer four or five years out calculating the increase in more does. It makes the difference between us not being able to shoot a doe and being able to kill one or two on our 300 acres.

I know predators have a place - but I believe it needs to be at levels reduced from the present population. I come from the days when quail hunting was my favorite sport. We have almost no quail now. I always used to have rabbit dogs. We have almost no rabbits. The statewide poult per hen turkey numbers is consistently less than 2. The state has sponsored two different turkey nesting studies and found beyond a shadow of a doubt, primarily coons and coyotes were the most prevalent nest predators - with coyotes often killing the hen. I can remember the 1980’s with $20 coons, $40 coyotes, and $120 cats - quail, turkeys, and rabbits were thick. They have been replaced with coons, coyotes, and bobcats.

I prefer turkeys and quail to coyotes and coons. And before anyone says it - I did my bird and turkey hunting in commercial timberland clearcuts and pine plantations - not overgrown field edges and and gardens. There is probably more habitat like I used to hunt now - than forty years ago when small game was prevalent.

I agree - coyotes probably eat a few coons - and in my area, I believe them to be an important predator on young feral hogs. Coyotes are difficult to hunt and trap - your average hunter or trapper is incapable of consistently catching or killing coyotes. We have hundreds of thousands of deer hunters statewide and tens of thousand of turkey hunters. We have a handful of predator hunters and trappers. As hunters, we haveto have bag limits and restrictive seasons to insure we dont overharvest most game species - but with predators - for all practical purposes - their harvest is incidental to other hunting activity. As with everything, there is a balance - it is just that we are keeping the popular species in check and allowing predators free reign.

I have seen much better overall hunting days than we have now - and it coincided with a greatly reduced predator population. I would pass a 125” buck to shoot a coyote. If my efforts save one turkey or fawn every year - then I have been successful. ;)
 
I've seen better hunting days also, especially with quail. I use to blame coyotes but the research I've done indicates nest predation by coons outnumbers all other predator affects on quail numbers. And yotes kill coons so I'm all for that. In fact (this is interesting) I have no hatred for the coyote but actively pursue the coon with a vengeance as often as I can!

I'm curious (and don't take this wrong as I think every region is different) are you guys in other parts of the country seeing a significant decline in deer numbers? Will they be extinct in your area in the next 10-20yrs? I truly think the herd has balanced where I'm at. I'm not seeing the numbers I did in the 80's but they certainly are not on the decline right now (except for the occasional disease outbreak which yotes can help with). Like I said, don't take this question wrong as every place is different. I don't want to make assumptions about your place based on observations on mine. Lots of factors to explore.
 
^^^ You and I are very much on the same page with this topic! I seldom shoot a yote while on stand, choosing instead to watch and enjoy the show. I've gotten to know certain yotes during a season and look forward to seeing them on any given morning. They catch a mouse or two and pretty much rub shoulders with deer without fear from them (sometimes a young buck or doe will chase a yote off for a few yards, but I've never seen it the other way around).

I think I've read much of the same studies as you talked about. One thing I didn't see as I scanned through your post was the fact that coyotes increase litter size when the population drops. So, since the yote rut happens in Feb/March and the pups are born in conjunction of fawning dates of mid summer... if you shoot yotes in the middle of winter it stands to reason that you are encouraging larger littler of pups. Hence the lack of declining population numbers, even when associated with intense trapping.

Thanks for the thread. Enjoyable thread for me.
I agree Cat and you bring up some good points. I wonder if your state is better with their control in part lower deer numbers and perhaps better cover which is the key to true predator control. Interesting about shooting mid winter and makes sense. And most of us tend to hunt or trap mid- late winter. Most suggest more productive for fawns if killing predators is done right before fawning season.
I certainly appreciate and have no dispute to your post Dogghr. I admire yotes for what they are. I will waste an arrow on them, but rarely a bullet. Thats for trophy reasons only. But i will confess that my motto is kill them all, because more will show up.
I have hunted them for sport and fur and been as excited on those hunts as most any other. Hats off to wily coyote. Doesnt mean i wont wish to drop the last one of them, selfishly i suppose.
No problem with that, I think any animal should be fair game and I've taken my fair share but pay attention to what was said about the transient population. Since I've ceased worrying about them as much, and spent effort more on habitat protection, I see less affect by them. And I have probably one of the most deer densities as any on here.
Where I live, there are 1.7 fetuses per adult doe and slightly less than .5 fawns per doe. Our G&F refuses to study coyotes - yet they do a study on how many fawns feral hogs are eating - could not prove any. In our state, our G&F also protects coyotes during May and June - during fawning season - but you may kill them the rest of the year. You may legally kill a coyote during May and June if it is depredating your garden eating a fifty cent tomato - but you may not legally kill a coyote in June while it is killing a fawn in which you spend thousands of dollars trying to produce. At my place, frequency of coyote pictures in my best fawning cover increases three hundred percent during May and June - they know it is fawning season and adjust their hunting patterns accordingly. I trap coyotes around one of my three gardens during May and June to keep them from eating tomatoes. At least at my place - you dont have to catch them all - you just have to pressure them. Catch one or two and display the carcasses and the frequency of pictures goes way down. I have done annual camera surveys for years, and since I have started trapping around my gardens - catching a couple coyotes per year - my fawn recruitment numbers have gone from .5 to .6. That is a 20% increase - that is a LOT in my estimation. Especially when you project the increase in deer four or five years out calculating the increase in more does. It makes the difference between us not being able to shoot a doe and being able to kill one or two on our 300 acres.

I know predators have a place - but I believe it needs to be at levels reduced from the present population. I come from the days when quail hunting was my favorite sport. We have almost no quail now. I always used to have rabbit dogs. We have almost no rabbits. The statewide poult per hen turkey numbers is consistently less than 2. The state has sponsored two different turkey nesting studies and found beyond a shadow of a doubt, primarily coons and coyotes were the most prevalent nest predators - with coyotes often killing the hen. I can remember the 1980’s with $20 coons, $40 coyotes, and $120 cats - quail, turkeys, and rabbits were thick. They have been replaced with coons, coyotes, and bobcats.

I prefer turkeys and quail to coyotes and coons. And before anyone says it - I did my bird and turkey hunting in commercial timberland clearcuts and pine plantations - not overgrown field edges and and gardens. There is probably more habitat like I used to hunt now - than forty years ago when small game was prevalent.

I agree - coyotes probably eat a few coons - and in my area, I believe them to be an important predator on young feral hogs. Coyotes are difficult to hunt and trap - your average hunter or trapper is incapable of consistently catching or killing coyotes. We have hundreds of thousands of deer hunters statewide and tens of thousand of turkey hunters. We have a handful of predator hunters and trappers. As hunters, we haveto have bag limits and restrictive seasons to insure we dont overharvest most game species - but with predators - for all practical purposes - their harvest is incidental to other hunting activity. As with everything, there is a balance - it is just that we are keeping the popular species in check and allowing predators free reign.

I have seen much better overall hunting days than we have now - and it coincided with a greatly reduced predator population. I would pass a 125” buck to shoot a coyote. If my efforts save one turkey or fawn every year - then I have been successful. ;)
I've said it before, our DNR is pretty hunter oriented. We can take yotes year round and even hunt at night most of the year with special lights. I do think at one time they didn't take into account the affect of various predators on the herd but that has changed.
Studies do show very little affect on fawning by hogs as compared to major affect that can occur from bear and coyote. No argument again with your trapping or shooting. And discussions on these type of forums is much different than with the general group of hunters. I dare say, that 90% of hunters in my state hunt over some type of corn pile. That's no problem for me if they choose, but they are the same that will stop their car to shoot a running a yote running across the field cursing each one. Habitat and population control is the key.
What is different today? Before the coyote we had the wolf and mountain lion that fed on the deer. We changed the habitat so it no longer gives the needed protection for both adult deer and fawns. Forests are overbrowsed with no understory. Farming is so clean their is seldom fence edges, or crop trash in the open fields. Those same fields are barren most of the year after harvest, even tho that has changed somewhat. We allowed the deer population to explode in the 80s and 90s and the predators followed the food.
And where do you choose to draw the line? Im sure my Red Tail, Bald Eagle, and Coopers all take more small game like rabbits than my yotes. No doubt in my mind an eagle with a 6+ foot wing spand can take a new born fawn with little effort and can see them easily as they soar thru the sky. Do I shoot all of them also? Some times we can be not much different than the so called tree huggers. We choose that which we want to do and then rationalize it. I think bear actually take more fawns than yotes and their are studies beginning to show that. Haven't started that talk here yet. That's not directed to you Swampcat, just the hunting population in general.
Again, no problem with shooting or trapping yotes for me, but the sooner we realize its limitations the less frustrated we will be and improvement in habitat will give better results.
And we have to recognize they are here to stay and with eventual loss of interest in hunting, the predator may be the only controller of the herds. They are here to stay,and except with changing the structure of our landscape, we probably will have little affect on their numbers as long as food is readily available. Thanks for reading.
 
Interesting stuff. I was raised that the only good yote was a dead one. We have recently seen an increase in yote numbers at my place to the point we are looking seriously into hunting them for the first time. They have always simply been a target of opportunity before. I have never lost a deer to a yote however. I even had a buck recovered 7 days after the shot and the deer wasn't touched just 2 years ago. This thread has certainly given me some food for thought.
 
Thank you for this thread. Thank you for mentioning Aldo Leopold. On my Western Elk hunt this year, I killed a nice bull on day one. So, I had a lot of time to read. I took "A Sand County Almanac" with me this year and was quite inspired when I read it. As a new landowner in far Northern MN, I've seen my share of predators on camera already. Last Fall, shortly after closing on the property, my hunting partner was surprised by a pack of five wolves. They sized him up, and decided they wanted no part of a guy with a rifle. We did a little investigating and found a number of beds under spruce trees, filled with dog hair, urine, and you could even smell them if you tried. We didn't see any deer that day. Many up there say to follow the "Three S" rule. Maybe I'm naive, but I disagree. I haven't learned to hate them yet.

It seems to me that any really healthy ecosystem needs predators. I've got them. Wolves, bobcat, bear all visit my place. I've got pictures to prove it. Maybe that's why I don't see many deer. But, I tend to think it's simply because my stretch of woods doesn't have much to set it apart. It's just the same 15 year old regenerated forest that everybody else has. I'm working to change that. I don't think I can blame the predators for the boring, flat, sea of poplar.

One neighbor, who's been on this Earth a lot longer than me, has influenced me with his opinion. Mind you, his opinion is informed by decades of experience, as well as generational wisdom. His ancestors homesteaded the land he still owns, as well as what I now own. He told me something like this, "There have always been wolves here. I don't think there are more now than there were 50 years ago, or less. And, there have always been deer here too. Like the wolves, I don't think there are more or less than ever. This is pretty rough country, without much agriculture. So, all these animals just live the way they have always lived, for the most part. I guess we can just let them keep doing that." Mind you, I'm in the big woods of Northern MN, far from major agriculture. I like it this way.

Now, all that aside. When I see a wolf or bear on a camera, I generally don't get any deer pictures for a couple of days. The wolf will be pictured sniffing around in front of the camera for a few minutes, then nothing visits for a while. This doesn't surprise me. It's also informed the way I plan to hunt. I imagine my stench is just as offensive, maybe more, than their natural predators. Maybe not. Either way, I'm sure my presence, and the presence of a wolf or bear, has an impact on the deer. That's OK.

I'm not interested in turning my little slice of the big woods into a county park. I like it wild. If I can help the deer then I will, and I've got a plan in place to do just that. But, I don't think it needs to come at the expense of every predator in the neighborhood. I like seeing them. I wish I could see them more. It's a balance though, I'm sure. Maybe the longer I'm up there the more I'll learn to dislike them. I hope not.

Laker
 
I think it makes a lot of difference where you live. In AR, our turkeys have taken a nose dive and I often hear other hunters exclaim “it cant be predators - kansas is covered up with turkeys, and quail, and rabbits, and pheasants and they have lots of coyotes”. Bingo - they have lots of varied food source of all types. In AR, we have few turkeys, no pheasants, almost no quail and rabbits. Cotton rat numbers are nothing like they used to be - so yes - the small game populations in KS can withstand some predation and still be ok. When about the only ground living animals you have are deer and turkey and coon - then those animals are going to be predated more by the coyotes than if they had this buffet to choose from. I think the same with deer - if you have high deer densities - you may even NEED coyotes to help control the population. If you have a deer per thirty or forty acres and coyotes are taking half your fawns - they are adversely affecting hunters. In Alabama, they have even identified areas they call predator pits - areas where predators have reduced the deer population to the point it is unable to recover without adjusting antlerless harvest. Those coyotes are definately impacting hunters.

Do I think we can control predators - no - not unless we see the same prices in todays dollars we saw for fur back in the late 79’s and early 89’s. If we had $50 coons, $80 yotes and $200 cats, there would be a lot of folks coon hunting all night, running traps at first light, and sending their wife out during the day while they slept to pick up road kill. That is what it was like where I live in 1980. You hunted for a coon track - and yes, I found eight covies of quail in an afternoon, my dogs ran rabbits until they were exhausted, and I heard as many as 16 different gobblers in one morning. Those days are gone and will not return.

So we have to do something different. It takes a concerted effort to control predators in mass. Hunters are not going to do that as a recreational hobby - it is work. It is forty degrees at my house and pouring rain. Forty years ago, I would have been out in it running traps. Today, I look out the window at it, while I am typing this and throw another log on the fire. Not worth it for $1 coons.

I do everything I can to produce better habitat for my wildlife - of all species. But, I liken this to my sweet corn patch. I can fertilize and till the dirt, I weed and water the corn, I choose the best seed for my area, I fence the garden with field fence and string an additional two or three hot wires, I put up scarecrows, tin plates and streamers. I do everything humanly possible to provide the best habitat for my sweet corn. You know what? I wont recover a single ear of corn out of four 250’ long rows if I dont KILL the coons. I have a DP trap at each corner and several coil springs set in the garden. Two live traps. For two weeks before harvest, my wife and I make a pass just after dark with a .22. Last year, we killed 18 coons in and around the garden in ten days. They still got almost one third the ears. I plant extra because I know I will need it.

Just because you provide the best habitat conditions possible does not necessarily mean you can ignore one component of the environment.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hit the nail on the head. As a guy getting ready to throw 2 years worth on coon hides (20-25 I don't hit it too hard) in the ditch because I have no where to sell hides, trapping is in a bad shape. I used to get a permit to trap public land, passed on that this year. I may set a few on my place just to kill some egg eaters but as you said to be effective you need the longline guys making money. People grossly underestimate the affect small predators have on small game population. The numbers of coons, skunks, opossums, mink, weasels, etc you have on an acre compared to the evil coyote would amaze most people.
 
I think I have put this on here before but still an interesting read:

https://www.amazon.com/Coyote-America-Natural-Supernatural-History/dp/0465052991

No animal has be persecuted as much as the coyote and yet they have done nothing but expand there range. I love to hunt coyotes but I am not mad at them for eating "my" deer or turkeys. They eat enough nest predators that I call us even.
Man always thinks he has control whether it be his weather, land, health, or signifacant other. Sooner he realizes that, the more content he can be.:)
Thank you for this thread. Thank you for mentioning Aldo Leopold. On my Western Elk hunt this year, I killed a nice bull on day one. So, I had a lot of time to read. I took "A Sand County Almanac" with me this year and was quite inspired when I read it. As a new landowner in far Northern MN, I've seen my share of predators on camera already. Last Fall, shortly after closing on the property, my hunting partner was surprised by a pack of five wolves. They sized him up, and decided they wanted no part of a guy with a rifle. We did a little investigating and found a number of beds under spruce trees, filled with dog hair, urine, and you could even smell them if you tried. We didn't see any deer that day. Many up there say to follow the "Three S" rule. Maybe I'm naive, but I disagree. I haven't learned to hate them yet.

It seems to me that any really healthy ecosystem needs predators. I've got them. Wolves, bobcat, bear all visit my place. I've got pictures to prove it. Maybe that's why I don't see many deer. But, I tend to think it's simply because my stretch of woods doesn't have much to set it apart. It's just the same 15 year old regenerated forest that everybody else has. I'm working to change that. I don't think I can blame the predators for the boring, flat, sea of poplar.

One neighbor, who's been on this Earth a lot longer than me, has influenced me with his opinion. Mind you, his opinion is informed by decades of experience, as well as generational wisdom. His ancestors homesteaded the land he still owns, as well as what I now own. He told me something like this, "There have always been wolves here. I don't think there are more now than there were 50 years ago, or less. And, there have always been deer here too. Like the wolves, I don't think there are more or less than ever. This is pretty rough country, without much agriculture. So, all these animals just live the way they have always lived, for the most part. I guess we can just let them keep doing that." Mind you, I'm in the big woods of Northern MN, far from major agriculture. I like it this way.

Now, all that aside. When I see a wolf or bear on a camera, I generally don't get any deer pictures for a couple of days. The wolf will be pictured sniffing around in front of the camera for a few minutes, then nothing visits for a while. This doesn't surprise me. It's also informed the way I plan to hunt. I imagine my stench is just as offensive, maybe more, than their natural predators. Maybe not. Either way, I'm sure my presence, and the presence of a wolf or bear, has an impact on the deer. That's OK.

I'm not interested in turning my little slice of the big woods into a county park. I like it wild. If I can help the deer then I will, and I've got a plan in place to do just that. But, I don't think it needs to come at the expense of every predator in the neighborhood. I like seeing them. I wish I could see them more. It's a balance though, I'm sure. Maybe the longer I'm up there the more I'll learn to dislike them. I hope not.

Laker
Thanks for the perspective from different area of the country. And knowledge from the senior friend you have is always worth listening. And welcome to the forum.
I think it makes a lot of difference where you live. In AR, our turkeys have taken a nose dive and I often hear other hunters exclaim “it cant be predators - kansas is covered up with turkeys, and quail, and rabbits, and pheasants and they have lots of coyotes”. Bingo - they have lots of varied food source of all types. In AR, we have few turkeys, no pheasants, almost no quail and rabbits. Cotton rat numbers are nothing like they used to be - so yes - the small game populations in KS can withstand some predation and still be ok. When about the only ground living animals you have are deer and turkey and coon - then those animals are going to be predated more by the coyotes than if they had this buffet to choose from. I think the same with deer - if you have high deer densities - you may even NEED coyotes to help control the population. If you have a deer per thirty or forty acres and coyotes are taking half your fawns - they are adversely affecting hunters. In Alabama, they have even identified areas they call predator pits - areas where predators have reduced the deer population to the point it is unable to recover without adjusting antlerless harvest. Those coyotes are definately impacting hunters.

Do I think we can control predators - no - not unless we see the same prices in todays dollars we saw for fur back in the late 79’s and early 89’s. If we had $50 coons, $80 yotes and $200 cats, there would be a lot of folks coon hunting all night, running traps at first light, and sending their wife out during the day while they slept to pick up road kill. That is what it was like where I live in 1980. You hunted for a coon track - and yes, I found eight covies of quail in an afternoon, my dogs ran rabbits until they were exhausted, and I heard as many as 16 different gobblers in one morning. Those days are gone and will not return.

So we have to do something different. It takes a concerted effort to control predators in mass. Hunters are not going to do that as a recreational hobby - it is work. It is forty degrees at my house and pouring rain. Forty years ago, I would have been out in it running traps. Today, I look out the window at it, while I am typing this and throw another log on the fire. Not worth it for $1 coons.

I do everything I can to produce better habitat for my wildlife - of all species. But, I liken this to my sweet corn patch. I can fertilize and till the dirt, I weed and water the corn, I choose the best seed for my area, I fence the garden with field fence and string an additional two or three hot wires, I put up scarecrows, tin plates and streamers. I do everything humanly possible to provide the best habitat for my sweet corn. You know what? I wont recover a single ear of corn out of four 250’ long rows if I dont KILL the coons. I have a DP trap at each corner and several coil springs set in the garden. Two live traps. For two weeks before harvest, my wife and I make a pass just after dark with a .22. Last year, we killed 18 coons in and around the garden in ten days. They still got almost one third the ears. I plant extra because I know I will need it.

Just because you provide the best habitat conditions possible does not necessarily mean you can ignore one component of the environment.
I agree with your first paragraph as each area of the country has its own management issues. Certainly the SE is really struggling with this problem.
The 3rd paragraph may be accurate, but you give no alternatives that may work. I do know that even if fur prices go up 100%, that management on a large scale will be ineffective simply because most have not the time, knowledge, or desire to trap across an entire state to make it effective. Not to be pessimistic, but that group is a dying breed. Just as the new breed of hunters are much different group.
And as studies show, removing limited numbers make no diff. I understand your frustration as to work your land yet still have drama with predators. But your place is but a dot on the landscape even if it is couple thousand acres. A tract nearly adjacent to me is about 6000 ac, actively managed for deer including eliminating predators. After 15 years, that tract is no different than mine. As I will repeatedly say, predators are here, and our management has to change and accept the fact to prevent frustration and aggravation especially by small property owners. We have changed the landscape over the last 100+ years. Open land is reduced. Natural growth such as the southern savanahs, the advent of monoculture pine plantations, loss of Oak forests and prairie grasses, etc, all of which provided at one time protection form the very predators that have always been there. There is no real going back, too many people with too little land.
Our days of doe harvest may be over just as it used to be. It has to be taken into account on my place mortality by hunter, automobile, poaching, and the natural predator. I can legally take 8 doe and with 2 hunters that is a chunk. We've taken 2 doe in 4 years and I can see the affect. Any more and numbers would be poor in buck harvest.
Predators are simply here to stay, and in the not to distant future, the wolf and mountain lion will probably be joining the bear and yote as they migrate back also. Not being pessimistic, just realistic, and my frustration has ended once I accepted and managed accordingly.
 
Man always thinks he has control whether it be his weather, land, health, or signifacant other. Sooner he realizes that, the more content he can be.:)

Thanks for the perspective from different area of the country. And knowledge from the senior friend you have is always worth listening. And welcome to the forum.

I agree with your first paragraph as each area of the country has its own management issues. Certainly the SE is really struggling with this problem.
The 3rd paragraph may be accurate, but you give no alternatives that may work. I do know that even if fur prices go up 100%, that management on a large scale will be ineffective simply because most have not the time, knowledge, or desire to trap across an entire state to make it effective. Not to be pessimistic, but that group is a dying breed. Just as the new breed of hunters are much different group.
And as studies show, removing limited numbers make no diff. I understand your frustration as to work your land yet still have drama with predators. But your place is but a dot on the landscape even if it is couple thousand acres. A tract nearly adjacent to me is about 6000 ac, actively managed for deer including eliminating predators. After 15 years, that tract is no different than mine. As I will repeatedly say, predators are here, and our management has to change and accept the fact to prevent frustration and aggravation especially by small property owners. We have changed the landscape over the last 100+ years. Open land is reduced. Natural growth such as the southern savanahs, the advent of monoculture pine plantations, loss of Oak forests and prairie grasses, etc, all of which provided at one time protection form the very predators that have always been there. There is no real going back, too many people with too little land.
Our days of doe harvest may be over just as it used to be. It has to be taken into account on my place mortality by hunter, automobile, poaching, and the natural predator. I can legally take 8 doe and with 2 hunters that is a chunk. We've taken 2 doe in 4 years and I can see the affect. Any more and numbers would be poor in buck harvest.
Predators are simply here to stay, and in the not to distant future, the wolf and mountain lion will probably be joining the bear and yote as they migrate back also. Not being pessimistic, just realistic, and my frustration has ended once I accepted and managed accordingly.

I agree - unfortunately, there is no widespread solution. G&f agencies champion improving habitat like it costs nothing to do and a one time shot lasts forever. All of this management work is ongoing. I plant food plots every year, you have to spray select invasives and burn NWSG, tsi is ongoing. I know of no management prescription that is a once and done. I hate it for the guy two miles away from me who doesnt trap or hunt coyotes during May and June and has to settle for a fawn recruitment of .5 - while I get out and manage my predators and have a fawn recruitment of .6. It is a choice we make. It is true - most will accept predation as part of the big picture and accept what they have in the way of other wildlife. If that is acceptable to them - then that is great. I only own 300 acres and when the deer population got so low I felt like I couldnt kill a doe and only one or two bucks off my ground - in spite of a land management budget in the low five figures - you have to try everything. I dont just kill predators - I manage for them. I try to improve conditions for cotton rats and rabbits and songbirds so they can absorb some of the predation. I dont throw deer carcasses out on my land. I improve fawning and nesting habitat. TIMELY Killing a few predators is part of the package - and a neccesary part of the package. Most deer managers believe we have to kill a certain number of bucks and does every year to maintain a balanced healthy herd. Yet think we should let predators go largely un-managed. If our area supported forty deer per square mile and a gobbler or two per section, I probably wouldnt worry about it either. G&F could reduce the doe harvest to increase the number of deer - but they consider does to be one step above a rat that need to be shot en masse. You control what you can on your own property - however big or small it is. We dont shoot does and we manage for predators - and we have seen very positive results. I dont just hope for success - I work for it.
 
Interesting thread, thanks dogghr. Ever since I spotted the first coyotes on our property I started looking more and more into ways of hunting and trapping them. But the more I research the more I find that efforts to get rid of them seem to be counterproductive in the long run. Historically speaking we in America have been very successful at eradicating numerous species. Gray wolves, grizzlies, bison, and others were almost completely eliminated from the lower 48. Even white tailed deer numbers dropped precipitously. Only through conservation efforts in recent decades have these animals started to make a comeback. But the coyote is a completely different story. Following the eradication of the gray wolf at the turn of the twentieth century, efforts turned to the elimination of the coyote. But despite almost a century of pressure, coyote numbers have gone up, not down. Formerly their range was limited to an area west of the Mississippi. Now they are found in every state except Hawaii.
0b414f7d1026c0280fab80479308727d.jpg

As you can see from the map, they don't just survive under pressure, they thrive. Even with the encouragement of federal, state and local governments in the early 1900s, their range expanded as the pressure increased. In Montana, for example, around the turn of the century the government offered a bounty on wolves and coyotes. Over the course of about a decade, the wolf bounties went from over 20,000 down to about 17. Coyote harvests on the other hand stayed right around 30,000 for three decades. In the 1940s the US government developed new poisons to use specifically on coyotes because strychnine no longer worked. The problem was that strychnine killed them too quickly. If one coyote noticed another coyote dying after eating bait with strychnine, it learned to avoid it and taught its offspring to do the same. So three new poisons were developed, designed to kill them over the course of a week or two. As you can see from the map above, that didn't work out too well either.
So why were we able to eliminate wolves so efficiently but we can't seem to control coyote populations? I've heard some interesting theories on this and of course there's still some ongoing studies. But it seems like they have some impressive reproductive strategies. One theory is that when they do their howling at night, they are doing a role call. If one coyote fails to report for the role call, some how dominant females will then have larger litters the next go round. Whatever the mechanism, it seems like the more you kill, an even greater number will eventually come back. And this new population will tend to skew younger, and like human youngsters coyote youngsters tend to be more aggressive and less averse to taking risks.
So what's a habitat manager to do? I think you might be on the right track dogghr, we just might have to learn to accept them as a part of the environment. If one is bold enough to show itself I'll take a shot at it, but I've decided for my little property any serious effort at hunting and trapping would be fruitless and maybe make things worse. But I do like Swampcat's idea about creating better habitat for the coyotes preferred prey, namely rodents. Maybe if they can keep their stomach full on those then fawns might stand a better chance. Maybe a stretch, but from the evidence it looks like the yotes ain't going away any time soon.
 
One of the big problems with the coyote is when your G&F refuses to even consider the issue. If you have high deer densities - coyotes may actually be a blessing. When you have low deer densities - coyotes begin affecting hunter success. When G&F agencies document declining fawn recruitment and do nothing to identify the problem or reduce doe harvest - then that is your problem.
 
You guys have put up a lot of great information and food for thought. From all that I've read and experienced, it appears that simply hunting dogs doesn't do much to control populations. However, I have a number of friends who have practically given up deer hunting to chase them by the light of the moon. It seems to be addictive. I'm of the opinion, like Dogghr and several others here, that everything has its place. However, I am going to have to draw the line at managing my property for rodents ;).
 
You guys have put up a lot of great information and food for thought. From all that I've read and experienced, it appears that simply hunting dogs doesn't do much to control populations. However, I have a number of friends who have practically given up deer hunting to chase them by the light of the moon. It seems to be addictive. I'm of the opinion, like Dogghr and several others here, that everything has its place. However, I am going to have to draw the line at managing my property for rodents ;).
Some interesting info on the Tall Timbers website in North Florida - probably the premier quail management facility in the country. Cotton rats do destroy quail nests and it was common belief to help nest survival, get rid of the rats. When they did that, the predators turned more to quail. Now, they spread supplemental feed in the form of milo to increase body fat on both quail and rats - which increases clutch or litter size - whichever the case may be. Also reduces time spent foraging by both quail and rats - which reduces predation. Now, predators back to eating more rats.

I even manage for honeybees and butterflies on my place. But I do have 25 bee hives.;)
 
I’m not overrun with yotes, but reading about fawn survival makes me wonder what’s going on at my place. It’s uncommon to see a doe without 2 or 3 fawns in the fall. However, there’s very few coons, rabbits, groundhogs etc.
my best guess is that the turkeys are keeping the yotes fed. It’s a common sight to drive by a cut corn field near my property and see 50-80 turkeys out there. Perhaps the yotes around me have adapted to hunt down the turkeys in April-June. Think about it, every time they gobble they’re telling everything in the woods where they are. It shouldn’t be hard for a yote to ambush them.


Sent from my iPhone using Deer Hunter Forum
 
Back
Top